Changing Democracy at Work

Who’s a lawyer? Could a law passed in Florida be made forcefully recognized in Kansas?

Seems like that would be the decision of the Kansas citizens to adopt that law, right? Then it wouldn’t be consider a forced recognition.

happy pride baby I’ve read the reactions to President Bush’s June 3rd radio address on several blogs and I can’t believe this is/was an issue in the U.S. I then read the white house’s transcripts to Bush’s address and yep, it’s religiously charged and probably motivated by party promise, but that’s what the majority voted for.

Even though I believe our government should have more pressing events and issues to consider, these arguments signal a change in our social chemistry. This change should be acknowledged and if all possible nurtured. Just like in 1948, California’s state Supreme Court’s struck down California’s law against interracial marriage. What’s wrong with redefining our laws to fit the needs of our current-day culture? Maybe same-sex marriages could be the next step to “stabilizing our society” by defusing prejudices between our citizens.

According to Bush:

“The Defense of Marriage Act declares that no state is required to accept another state’s definition of marriage.”

Under the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, all governmental powers not granted to the United States Federal Government by the Constitution are reserved for the states. But not one state government has power over another state government so why is this proposed amendment even legislatively necessary?

I can appreciate Bush’s appeal to promote the welfare of children and the stability of society. But the definition of a family unit has so greatly changed over the last 50 years that sometimes we can’t always refer to the “Ages of Experience” for guidance in protecting the interests of all.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Tags: ,